According to Alfes et al., Cited in Armstrong and Taylor (2014) defined
engagement with three dimensions,
1. Intellectual engagement – Concentration on performing
best for the given job tasks.
2.Affective
engagement – Positive thoughts on work
related actions.
3.Social engagement – Smartly interact with
others by discussions on improvements and collect feed backs.
| Source : Harvard Business Review 2015 |
According to Harvard Business Review (2015), As for an example In a Gallup survey,
Employees with high engagement in the selected organizations had 25% to 65% less employee turnover compared to others and ranked higher in productivity and consumer
satisfaction. and . (Depending on whether they were traditionally low- or
high-turnover organizations). They also received higher marks in productivity
and customer satisfaction. According to Graber (2015) Engagement is directly not
all about philosophy as it has a connection with bottom –line.
According
to various scenarios there have been some complications on Employee
Engagement. Therefore some examples on them are described below with
accordance to Kruise, (2012).
Employee engagement does not mean
employee happiness.
When a person is happy doesn’t mean
they are dedicated on their works. Arrangements on parties and other
requirements do not increase their willingness to do work on behalf of the
company.
Employee engagement doesn't mean employee
satisfaction.
Satisfaction is not adequate as the
employee can reach another organization with higher salary. Even though the
workforce itself can do their required work on time as scheduled but will not
go for a extra mile on behalf of the company.
Definition: Employee engagement is
the emotional commitment the employee has to the organization and its goals.
If an employee dedicates towards the
company without considering any advantages from it and sincerely works on behalf
of a company, He or she will go for an extra mile without asking and be loyal
to the mother organization as Employee engagement is an emotional concept which
leads the organization to the created goals smoothly.
For examples with reference to Towers
Perrin research companies with engaged workers have 6% higher net profit margins,
and as per Kenexa research engaged companies have five times higher shareholder
returns over five years.
Conclusion :
Employee engagement is a theme which is beneficial for the company in long term. while being the strength of the organization , it can globalization effects smoothly. There are no specific or correct way to measure it. This enhance by motivation and There should be a bind between employer and employee in order to gain trust among each other and build up as a team. Finally with less attrition and dedication of workforce will give you the results which will move the organizations towards objectives efficiently.
Armstrong, M,Taylor,S 2014, Armstrong’s Handbook Of Human Resource Management Practice,Kogan Page Limited, United Kingdom.
Graber, S, The two sides employee engagement,
Harvard Business Review,2015, December.
Kruise, K, What Is Employee Engagement, 2012, Forbs Media LLC
Available from : https://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2012/06/22/employee-engagement-what-and-why/#bbe257d7f372 (28.12.2018)
I really apprecited to you on this blog.keep it up
ReplyDelete